Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care & Rehab

Quality Measures

The following table shows how this nursing home performs in key quality measure areas. For important information on the meaning of quality measures or how rankings are determined, click the associated question mark symbol symbol.

Percentage of residents who...Performance Ranking learn more about performance ranking
learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have pressure sores (high risk residents) Have pressure sores (high risk residents)
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
11% This Facility
13% State average
11% National average
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

4 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have pressure sores (low risk residents) Have pressure sores (low risk residents)
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
2% This Facility
2% State average
2% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have pressure sores (short stay) Have pressure sores (short stay)
Reporting period: July 2008 to June 2009
18% This Facility
17% State average
14% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who lose control of bowels or bladder Lose control of bowels or bladder
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
53% This Facility
52% State average
50% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who had catheter inserted and left in bladder Had catheter inserted and left in bladder
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
2% This Facility
4% State average
5% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who had a urinary tract infection Had a urinary tract infection
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
9% This Facility
8% State average
9% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who were physically restrained Were physically restrained
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
0% This Facility
3% State average
4% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who spend most of their time in bed or chair Spend most of their time in bed or chair
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
1% This Facility
2% State average
4% National average
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

4 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who had decreased ability to move about Had decreased ability to move about
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
8% This Facility
14% State average
12% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who had increased need for help with daily activity Had increased need for help with daily activity
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
6% This Facility
16% State average
15% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who lose too much weight Lose too much weight
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
7% This Facility
8% State average
8% National average
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

4 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who are more depressed or anxious Are more depressed or anxious
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
11% This Facility
13% State average
15% National average
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

4 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have delirium (short stay) Have delirium (short stay)
Reporting period: July 2008 to June 2009
0% This Facility
1% State average
2% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have moderate to severe pain Have moderate to severe pain
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
1% This Facility
3% State average
4% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who have moderate to severe pain (short stay) Have moderate to severe pain (short stay)
Reporting period: July 2008 to June 2009
13% This Facility
15% State average
20% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who given flu vaccine Given flu vaccine
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
90+% This Facility
92% State average
90% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who given flu vaccine (short stay) Given flu vaccine (short stay)
Reporting period: July 2008 to June 2009
87% This Facility
85% State average
82% National average
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

3 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who given pneumococcal vaccine Given pneumococcal vaccine
Reporting period: October 2008 to June 2009
90+% This Facility
94% State average
89% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars

learn more about the measure: percentage of residents who given pneumococcal vaccine (short stay) Given pneumococcal vaccine (short stay)
Reporting period: July 2008 to June 2009
90+% This Facility
88% State average
82% National average
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

5 out of 5 stars


Scores marked 90+% indicate that the nursing home reported a score of greater than 90 percent

Related Information